Report

5G NSA vs Stand Alone

Free Report

Log in as a GSA user to access the free summary report. If you haven’t got an account, you can sign up for free.

5G NSA vs Stand Alone

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

As always, unlike our subscription-based Signals Ahead reports, you may forward this Signals Flash! report.

In previous publications and social media, we’ve indicated there are two primary motivators for upgrading to 5G Standalone (SA), and neither one of them involves network slicing. One motivator is that 5G SA improves handover optimisation, especially in a small cell network where there can be frequent ping ponging with the anchor macro cell (LTE), as well as with secondary small cells (5G). By removing the LTE component, the smartphone (UE) can simply leverage the best 5G small cell without having to worry about the LTE macro cell and the optimal pairing of macro and small cell. The other motivating factor is the impact 5G SA can have on improving enduser data speeds and spectral efficiency, in particular in the uplink direction. The focus of this Signals Flash report is to prove this latter argument with real world performance data.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS AND OBSERVATIONS

Our Thanks. We leveraged test equipment from Accuver Americas (XCAL5 and XCAP) as well as from Keysight Technologies (Umetrix Data). Both companies have been trusted partners for nearly two decades.

Our Methodology. We used two Motorola razr fold 2026 smartphones – one configured to support 5G SA (Band n2) and the other one configured to support 5G NSA (Band n2 + LTE Band 66). We did walk testing with both smartphones while the two phones simultaneously uploaded data (UDP full buffer) on the Verizon network (Ericsson infrastructure). We then analyzed the data using our standard methodology and metrics, with analysis looking at performance as a function of RSRP as well as geo binned data.

The Results. The results show the 5G SA smartphone had 2.2x higher spectral efficiency than the 5G NSA smartphone. The higher spectral efficiency was evident with both the 5G radio channel (Band n2 = 10 MHz) and especially the LTE radio channel (Band 66 = 20 MHz).

The Explanation. With 5G SA, the smartphone used uplink MIMO (2 data layers) while with 5G NSA, there was a single data layer on 5G and another data layer on LTE. LTE is also less spectral efficient than 5G. We also limited our analysis to 32T32R radios, although we note both LTE Band 66 and 5G Band n2 used the same massive MIMO radio.

©2026, all rights reserved by Signals Research Group

Please note disclaimer: The views expressed in this newsletter reflect those of Signals Research Group and are based on our understanding of past and current events shaping the wireless industry. This report is provided for informational purposes only and on the condition that it will not form a basis for any investment decision. The information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Signals Research Group makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Opinions, estimates, projections or forecasts in this report constitute the current judgment of the author(s) as of the date of this report. Signals Research Group has no obligation to update, modify or amend this report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.

If you feel our opinions, analysis or interpretations of events are inaccurate, please fell free to contact Signals Research Group. We are always seeking a more accurate understanding of the topics that influence the wireless industry. Reference in the newsletter to a company that is publicly traded is not a recommendation to buy or sell the shares of such company. Signals Research Group and/ or its affiliates/investors may hold securities positions in the companies discussed in this report and may frequently trade in such positions. Such investment activity may be inconsistent with the analysis provided in this report. Signals Research Group seeks to do business and may currently be doing business with companies discussed in this report. Readers should be aware that Signals Research Group might have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Additional information and disclosures can be found at our website at www.signalsresearch.com. This 17 | Signals Flash August 5, 2026 report may not be reproduced, copied, distributed or published without the prior written authorization of Signals Research Group (copyright ©2026, all rights reserved by Signals Research Group).

5G NSA vs Stand Alone

5G NSA vs Stand Alone

5G NSA vs Stand Alone

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

As always, unlike our subscription-based Signals Ahead reports, you may forward this Signals Flash! report.

In previous publications and social media, we’ve indicated there are two primary motivators for upgrading to 5G Standalone (SA), and neither one of them involves network slicing. One motivator is that 5G SA improves handover optimisation, especially in a small cell network where there can be frequent ping ponging with the anchor macro cell (LTE), as well as with secondary small cells (5G). By removing the LTE component, the smartphone (UE) can simply leverage the best 5G small cell without having to worry about the LTE macro cell and the optimal pairing of macro and small cell. The other motivating factor is the impact 5G SA can have on improving enduser data speeds and spectral efficiency, in particular in the uplink direction. The focus of this Signals Flash report is to prove this latter argument with real world performance data.

KEY HIGHLIGHTS AND OBSERVATIONS

Our Thanks. We leveraged test equipment from Accuver Americas (XCAL5 and XCAP) as well as from Keysight Technologies (Umetrix Data). Both companies have been trusted partners for nearly two decades.

Our Methodology. We used two Motorola razr fold 2026 smartphones – one configured to support 5G SA (Band n2) and the other one configured to support 5G NSA (Band n2 + LTE Band 66). We did walk testing with both smartphones while the two phones simultaneously uploaded data (UDP full buffer) on the Verizon network (Ericsson infrastructure). We then analyzed the data using our standard methodology and metrics, with analysis looking at performance as a function of RSRP as well as geo binned data.

The Results. The results show the 5G SA smartphone had 2.2x higher spectral efficiency than the 5G NSA smartphone. The higher spectral efficiency was evident with both the 5G radio channel (Band n2 = 10 MHz) and especially the LTE radio channel (Band 66 = 20 MHz).

The Explanation. With 5G SA, the smartphone used uplink MIMO (2 data layers) while with 5G NSA, there was a single data layer on 5G and another data layer on LTE. LTE is also less spectral efficient than 5G. We also limited our analysis to 32T32R radios, although we note both LTE Band 66 and 5G Band n2 used the same massive MIMO radio.

©2026, all rights reserved by Signals Research Group

Please note disclaimer: The views expressed in this newsletter reflect those of Signals Research Group and are based on our understanding of past and current events shaping the wireless industry. This report is provided for informational purposes only and on the condition that it will not form a basis for any investment decision. The information has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but Signals Research Group makes no representation as to the accuracy or completeness of such information. Opinions, estimates, projections or forecasts in this report constitute the current judgment of the author(s) as of the date of this report. Signals Research Group has no obligation to update, modify or amend this report or to otherwise notify a reader thereof in the event that any matter stated herein, or any opinion, projection, forecast or estimate set forth herein, changes or subsequently becomes inaccurate.

If you feel our opinions, analysis or interpretations of events are inaccurate, please fell free to contact Signals Research Group. We are always seeking a more accurate understanding of the topics that influence the wireless industry. Reference in the newsletter to a company that is publicly traded is not a recommendation to buy or sell the shares of such company. Signals Research Group and/ or its affiliates/investors may hold securities positions in the companies discussed in this report and may frequently trade in such positions. Such investment activity may be inconsistent with the analysis provided in this report. Signals Research Group seeks to do business and may currently be doing business with companies discussed in this report. Readers should be aware that Signals Research Group might have a conflict of interest that could affect the objectivity of this report. Additional information and disclosures can be found at our website at www.signalsresearch.com. This 17 | Signals Flash August 5, 2026 report may not be reproduced, copied, distributed or published without the prior written authorization of Signals Research Group (copyright ©2026, all rights reserved by Signals Research Group).

5G NSA vs Stand Alone

5G NSA vs Stand Alone
5G NSA vs Stand Alone
Date: 7th Aug 2026
Type: Industry Article
Technology: 5G
Originator: Signals Research Group

Global mobile Suppliers Association

© GSA 2026